This is the second post in my series on Building a Krishna Conscious "Mega Church". Part 1 can be found here.
Function Follows Form Influences Function
When we look at any purpose-built structure we find that the form of the structure is dictated by the function that it will perform.
Take a look at a service station (a "servo" in Australia, a "petrol station" in en-UK speaking countries). The whole layout of the facility is purely to facilitate its functionality: driveways - entry and exit; fuel pumps; underground tanks with access for petrol tankers; a shop and till.
Take a look at a supermarket: a huge parking lot; a specific layout with aisles and signs, laid out to guide shoppers through in a specific order; lanes and tills, with express lanes and regular lanes.
Take a look at an office building: multi-level with office spaces; toilets on or between floors; a kitchenette facility; elevators and stairs.
Take a look at a stadium: probably extensive parking near-by; huge entrances and corridors; extensive bathroom facilites; changing rooms; tiered seating; commercial facilites for caterers; sound system; video system.
Whatever the function that will be performed there, the building is designed and constructed to facilitate that.
Important Point:
- A "facility" (from Latin facilis - easy) is a particular form that makes a particular function easy.
In this way Form follows Function.
Form, in turn, influences function. For example: we leased a space for our yoga center downtown in Brisbane. We were unable to put a kitchen in there, although we had hoped that we would be able to. Due to this limitation, or particular characteristic of the form of the space our functionality was similarly limited, or shaped. So the form of the building supports certain functionality, and impedes other functionalities.
In this way Form influences Function.
Function Precedes Form
Another way of stating that Form follows Function is to say that Function precedes Form. In the case of our yoga center we already had our function. However, the form that we obtained did not support that function. Function precedes form. When you are designing a building you have in mind the function that it will support and facilitate. When you buy or rent an existing building, unless the function you wish to perform is a common use case (which yoga classes + dinner is not) then you may have to adapt the form (something that was easy to do in New Zealand, but very difficult in Nazi Australia), or restrict or adapt the functionality (which is what we ended up doing for a strained three years).
I would like to write a digressionary note about form and formlessness, but I don't have the energy or time right now. Suffice it to say:
- as Krishna says in Bhagavad-gita, that progress is difficult without a form, for the embodied. A form of some description gives people something to latch on to and helps them to get started and to progress. Eventually the forms must be abandoned (or at least attachment to the forms must be given up for pursuit of the function);
- as Bruce Lee said: "Learn all the techniques then forget them", or as Duke Ellington put it: "Learn all the scale and notes, then forget them and just wail";
- As soon as you instantiate a form you make a target for criticism. No-one will criticise you for doing nothing - it's only once you start trying to do *something* that people do that.
- As soon as you instantiate a form you create a pattern which can replace the thing that exists to support. Soon it goes from a form supporting a function to the function being to support and perpetuate the form, an inversion of the original proposition.
Anyway, form has its use, its misuse, and its abuse.
Tomorrow: A Brief Analysis of ISKCON Temple Design




Recent comments
1 day 14 hours ago
2 days 55 min ago
2 days 5 hours ago
2 days 10 hours ago
2 days 10 hours ago
2 days 11 hours ago
2 days 15 hours ago
5 days 16 hours ago
5 days 19 hours ago
6 days 2 hours ago