Milk: to drink or not to drink?

I culled this post from Krishna Consciousness & Ecological Awareness. I added the blog feed to Planet ISKCON, but this post is worth pulling out of the history, given the recent discussion on this issue.

The following is an excerpt from a lecture given by HH Hrdayananda das Goswami in Gainesville, Florida on August 30, 2008. To listen to the entire lecture, please click here.

Bhaktin Kelly: Does Krsna willing accept milk from cows that were raised inhumanely and will eventually be slaughted?

HH Hridayananda das Goswami: A sincere devotee could have two positions. You could just say, I am going to set a proper example and not patronize that cruel industry and not buy milk products- which is one position, which is obviously valid. And then another position, someone could say, is that by offering the milk, the cows benefit by the offering to the deity and you are actually saving cows. You could say that in practical terms, not ideological, the amount of milk that is being purchased and offered to the deities has absolutely zero impact on the dairy industry and, therefore, it does not change the economic dynamics of it. So it doesn’t save cows but it saves souls by engaging them in Krishna’s service.

What I see in the Bhagavatam is that within Vedic culture there was a diversity of views. People have different opinions on these things and a certain frame of consciousness. Some are inspired to save cows by offering their milk to the deity.

Now let’s say the devotee is not making a serious offering, not really connecting with the deity, just “I like milk.” Then I think to participate in this horrifically cruel industry just because you like milk is something which is much harder to justify. It is just one of those- “I’m hungry, I really want to eat, I have to offer it.” But if someone is seriously deity-conscious, their nature is really to worship Krsna, and their consciousness is to save the soul in the cow’s body, then I think, whether or not I would do that, is a position that should be respected.

Although, I do not think that devotees are required to do that. If I was managing a temple with deities, I would not say you have to offer milk. I think it is a matter of consciousness of the individual.

I respect your thought. But

I respect your thought. But as we all know milk is very vital to our body as a whole. Milk is a good source of vitamins and may be replacing other drink choices that might be higher in calories. Milk is also loaded with protein and nine different nutrients so it's a fantastic way to fill any gaps that might be opened when you start cutting calories.
life coach australia

Not all humans have lactase

Not all humans have lactase persistence. Most "one answer for everyone" prescriptions are wrong for at least some people. While we are sufficiently genetically compatible to interbreed, there is still significant variation in the human species genome pool.

Pharmacogenetics,the ability to predict the reaction of an individual to a particular substance based on their genome, promises to be one of the first major contributions of the ability to do cost-effective individual genome sequencing.

~Reply to life coach

~Reply to life coach australia.

I agree in offering all foods. Cows milk is pathogenic. The human body requires single amino acids to build it's own protein. Amino acids are readily available (predigested) in fruits and salad. My personal standpoint is I don't drink milk as part of my diet.

As with all biology, it's

As with all biology, it's gene-specific. Some humans have the lactase persistence genetic adaptation, some do not: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactose_intolerance#Lactase_persistence.

Domesticated cattle and humans with lactase persistence have co-evolved. Not all human races have co-evolved with cattle, so not all humans have lactase persistence.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer