I'm not personally familiar with the situation, and all newspaper reports give a slanted version of reality.
However, reading a couple of pieces in the LA Times I get a sense of the root cause of the meltdown of the major financial institutions of the US economy.
AIG cancels planned events amid rebukes for hosting $440,000 function and For insensitivity, Wachovia refuses to be outdone detail a disturbing sense of entitlement in the leadership of these financial institutions.
In the case of AIG, the company held an expensive event at a luxury resort for 100 of its agents, even as it received $85 billion of taxpayer money as a bailout by the government.
Wachovia, who have since cancelled it, planned a week long Mediterranean cruise for 75 employees, as it waited for its own bailout.
Not only is this behaviour inappropriate given the performance of these two companies, it points to an underlying culture that would explain why these financial institutions are in such crisis.
As John C. Maxwell puts it in his characteristic pithy style: "As you go up, you have to give up." Leaders give up their independence and their freedom of action as they assume more and more responsibility in an organisation and on behalf of the people they lead. Leadership means stewardship. Often they are compensated for this sacrifice with financial reward. Sometimes, for example in a volunteer organisation, they are not.
Being responsible for the financial wellbeing of literally millions of people is a weighty thing. Assuring them of housing and financial stability is no small thing - in fact its a fundamental necessity of human life. Those who assume this responsibility should be compensated.
However, when this responsibility is not faithfully discharged, where does a sense of entitlement come from?
I'm not asking for people to start falling on their swords, but when your company fails, when you fail to provide this financial security to the people, where do you get the sense that you are somehow entitled to huge amounts of compensation?
That's not qualified leadership. It represents the sickness of entitlement without qualification, a pathological condition of any organisation.
Lee Iacocca demonstrated executive leadership when he went, cap in hand, to Congress to beg for a bail out for Chrysler. He asked his executives to take a substantial pay cut, and he reduced his own salary to $1 per year.
That's appropriate and it shows the moral fiber of a true executive leader. Demanding that taxpayers pay out million dollar golden parachutes and continuing to send people on expensive junkets while the people lose their jobs and homes, on the other hand, demonstrates exactly what got us into this situation.
The full effect of this meltdown will be felt next year, as we see a retail collapse due to lack of consumer spending in the Christmas season. Then we are going to know what it's all about...

The
The other day I went to see Mike Myer's film "The Love Guru". First of all let me say that it contains some favorable (to devotional service) elements that have stuck in my mind - like the name of the village his character grew up in: "Haremakeester", and his greeting: "Mariska Hargitay" (a pig latin-inspired "Hare Krishna").




Recent comments
1 day 3 hours ago
2 days 22 hours ago
2 days 23 hours ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 11 hours ago
2 weeks 14 hours ago
2 weeks 23 hours ago
2 weeks 3 days ago